Steel v. Viscofan USA, Inc. et al
OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) the 19 Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is adopted; (2) plf's 8 Motion to Remand is denied; this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/1/17. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
VISCOFAN USA, INC., et
CIVIL ACTION NO.
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff filed this case in state court asserting
claims for worker’s compensation and products liability
stemming from a serious workplace injury.
state court severed the worker’s compensation claim and
the products-liability claims into two separate cases,
The case is now before the court on the
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
that plaintiff’s motion to remand be denied.
no objections to the recommendation.
has not objected, and after an independent and de novo
magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(doc. no. 19) is adopted.
(2) Plaintiff’s motion to remand (doc. no. 8) is
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge
for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 1st day of December, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?