Steel v. Viscofan USA, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 70 ) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. Defendant Viscofan, SA's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 52 ) is DENIED. 3. Defendant Viscofan, SA is directed to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by 6/4/2019. 4. Defendant Viscofan SA's objections are hereby OVERRULED. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 5/21/2019. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KAWAYNE STEELE,
Plaintiff,
v.
VISCOFAN USA, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________
KAWAYNE STEELE,
Plaintiff,
v.
VISCOFAN SA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-349-ALB

)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 2:18-cv-368-ALB
)
)
)
)
O R D E R 

On October 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc.
70) to which timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 71). After an independent
and de novo review of the record, the Recommendation, and the objections filed
to the Recommendation, and the Court concludes that Defendant Viscofan SA’s
objections should be overruled and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is
due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 70) be and is hereby
ADOPTED;
2. Defendant Viscofan, SA’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 52) is DENIED.
3.

Defendant Viscofan, SA is directed to file an answer to Plaintiff’s

Complaint by June 4, 2019.
4. Defendant Viscofan SA’s objections are hereby OVERRULED.
DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of May 2019.

/s/ Andrew L. Brasher
ANDREW L. BRASHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2