Akridge v. Alfa Insurance Companies
Filing
86
ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The Plf's 74 Motion to Stay Proceedings During Pendency of Review by the Eleventh Circuit of Petition for Writ of Mandamus and 79 Renewed Motion for Stay are DENIED as moot; 2) The Dft has until 9/5/2018 to SHOW CAUSE why the Plf's 79 alternative motion for an extended time period in which to respond to the pending 76 Motion for Summary Judgment ought not be granted. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 8/28/2018. (alm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JENNIFER AKRIDGE,
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
CASE NO.: 2:17cv372-GMB
)
[wo]
ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE
)
COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
ORDER
This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Proceedings During
Pendency of Review by the Eleventh Circuit of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 74)
and Renewed Motion for Stay or an Extension of the Summary Judgment Response (Doc.
79). The court having received the Order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
denying the Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 85), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Proceedings During Pendency of Review by
the Eleventh Circuit of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 74) and Renewed Motion for
Stay (Doc. 79) are DENIED as moot.
2.
The Defendant has until September 5, 2018 to show cause why the
Plaintiff’s alternative motion in Doc. 79 for an extended time period in which to respond
to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment ought not be granted.
DONE this 28th day of August, 2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?