Fuqua v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 29

ORDER: On May 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Defendants special report, (Doc. 19 ), now treated as a motion for summary judgment, be granted, and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 28 .) The Plaintiff has not timely filed any objections. The Court has conducted an independent review of the Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and agrees with the Magistrate Judges findings and analysis. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. [2 8]) is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendants Special Report, treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19 ), be GRANTED. 3. Judgment be GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 4. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 6/17/2020. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
REGINA RENEE FUQUA,
AIS # 179970,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-389-RAH

ORDER
On May 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Defendants’
special report, (Doc. 19), now treated as a motion for summary judgment, be granted,
and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 28.) The Plaintiff has not timely
filed any objections. The Court has conducted an independent review of the
Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s
findings and analysis.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation (Doc. 28) is ADOPTED.

2.

The Defendants’ Special Report, treated as a Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. 19), be GRANTED.
1

3.

Judgment be GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.

4.

This case be DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE, this 17th day of June, 2020.

/s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr.
R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2