Jackson v. Cieutat et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 12

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plf's 10 objections are overruled; (2) the 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopt ed; (3) plf's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 for unlawful arrest and imprisonment and for negligence and wantonness are dismissed with prejudice; (4) To the extent plf challenges the constitutionality of his conviction or claims that he is actually innocent, his claims are dismissed without prejudice to pursue those claims in an appropriate action; (5) To the extent plf attempts to bring pendent state-law claims, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claim s, and they are dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/8/17. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JEFFERY JAMES JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARK ALAN CIEUTAT and GUY
NAQUIN,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:17cv560-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court
as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s

objections

(doc.

no.

10)

are

overruled.
(2) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge’s

recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted.
(3) Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
for unlawful arrest and imprisonment and for negligence
and wantonness are dismissed with prejudice.

(4) To

the

extent

plaintiff

challenges

the

constitutionality of his conviction or claims that he is
actually

innocent,

prejudice

to

his

pursue

claims

those

are

claims

dismissed
in

an

without

appropriate

action.
(5) To

the

extent

plaintiff

attempts

to

bring

pendent state-law claims, the court declines to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over those claims, and they are
dismissed without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 8th day of November, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE