Robinson v. Lightner et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 47

ORDER, upon consideration of petitioner's "Motion ForDistrict Court Judge To Answer And Review Motion ToVacate Order" which the court construes as an 20 Appeal of Magistrate Judge's 18 order; ORDERING that the 18 Order is affirmed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/26/18. (djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES L. ROBINSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
WANDA LIGHTNER, Warden, and
STEVEN T. MARSHALL,
Attorney General for the
State of Alabama,
Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:17cv645-MHT
(WO)

ORDER
Upon

consideration

of

petitioner’s

“Motion

For

District Court Judge To Answer And Review Motion To
Vacate Order” (doc. no. 20), which the court construes
as an appeal of the United States Magistrate Judge’s
order (doc. no. 18) denying petitioner’s motion to vacate
an earlier order granting respondents’ motion for an
extension of time to answer, it is ORDERED that, upon
consideration of the appeal, the order at issue (doc. no.
18) is affirmed.
DONE, this the 26th day of April, 2018.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE