Springer et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 29

ORDER as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs' objections (Doc. 27 ) be and are hereby OVERRULED. 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 26 ) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 3. The motion of Defendant Sirote & Permutt, P.C., to dismiss (Doc. [ 7]) be and is hereby GRANTED and Defendant Sirote & Permutt, P.C., be and is hereby DISMISSED as a party to this action. 4. The motion of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to dismiss (Doc. 11 ) be and is hereby GRANTED and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank , N.A., be and is hereby DISMISSED as a party to this action. 5. The motion of Defendant Vernon Barnett, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Revenue, to dismiss (Doc. 13 ) be and is hereby GRANTED and Defendant Vernon Barnet t, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Revenue, be and is hereby DISMISSED as a party to this action. 6. Costs be and are taxed against Plaintiff. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/13/2018. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JEANETTA SPRINGER and
JACOB SPRINGER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-cv-693-ECM-WC

ORDER
Now pending before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(Doc. 26) which recommends that the motions to dismiss filed by the respective
Defendants (Doc. 7, 11, & 13) be granted and that Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. 1) be
dismissed. On July 30, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed objections to the Recommendation.
(Doc. 27). The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those
portions of the Recommendation to which objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b). The court finds the objections to be without merit and due to be overruled.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Plaintiffs’ objections (Doc. 27) be and are hereby OVERRULED.
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 26) be and is hereby
ADOPTED.

3. The motion of Defendant Sirote & Permutt, P.C., to dismiss (Doc. 7) be and
is hereby GRANTED and Defendant Sirote & Permutt, P.C., be and is hereby
DISMISSED as a party to this action.
4. The motion of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to dismiss (Doc. 11) be
and is hereby GRANTED and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., be and is
hereby DISMISSED as a party to this action.
5. The motion of Defendant Vernon Barnett, in his capacity as Commissioner of
the Alabama Department of Revenue, to dismiss (Doc. 13) be and is hereby
GRANTED and Defendant Vernon Barnett, in his capacity as Commissioner
of the Alabama Department of Revenue, be and is hereby DISMISSED as a
party to this action.
6. Costs be and are taxed against Plaintiff. A final judgment will be entered
separately.
DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of September 2018.

/s/ Emily C. Marks
EMILY C. MARKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE