Ryder Systems, Inc. v. Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC et al

Filing 21

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT: Upon consideration of the plaintiffs application to the clerk of court for entry of default against defendant Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC (doc. no. 13 ), and the plaintiffs brief addressing service of process o n said defendant (doc. no. 20 ), the court concludes thatdefendant Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC, was duly served with a summons and complaint, and has failed to answer or otherwise defend the plaintiffs claims within the time allowed to do so. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the default is entered against defendant Charleston AluminumTransportation, LLC. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/13/2018. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RYDER SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHARLESTON ALUMINUM TRANSPORTATION, LLC and DAVID E. ALLEN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv718-MHT (WO) ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT Upon consideration of the plaintiff’s application to the clerk of court for entry of default against defendant Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC (doc. no. 13), and the plaintiff’s brief addressing service of process on said defendant (doc. no. 20), the court concludes that defendant Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC, was duly served with a summons and complaint, and has failed to answer or otherwise defend the plaintiff’s claims within the Accordingly, time it is allowed ORDERED to that the do default so. is entered against defendant Charleston Aluminum Transportation, LLC. DONE, this the 13th day of September, 2018. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?