Sealey v. Branch Banking and Trust Company (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) plf's 14 objections are overruled; (2) the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) the 6 MOTION to Remand is denied; further ORDERING that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/19/18. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MELVIN LEWIS SEALEY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:17cv785-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
After
plaintiff
filed
this
case
in
the
Circuit
Court of Crenshaw County, Alabama, defendant removed
the
case
jurisdiction
to
this
pursuant
court,
to
asserting
28
U.S.C.
diversity
§
1332(a).
Plaintiff then moved to remand to state court.
The
case is now before the court on the recommendation of
the
United
States
Magistrate
motion to remand be denied.
Judge
that
plaintiff’s
Also before the court are
plaintiff’s objections to the recommendation.
Upon an
independent and de novo review of the record, the court
concludes that the objections should be overruled and
the recommendation adopted.
***
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s
objections
(doc.
no.
14)
are
overruled.
(2) The
recommendation
of
the
United
States
Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 13) is adopted.
(3) The motion to remand (doc. no. 6) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred
back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 19th day of September, 2018.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?