White v. King et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 16

ORDER: the 13 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) Plf's 1 complaint and 11 amendment thereto against Dft Bentley is DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii ); 2) Dft Bentley is DISMISSED as a party to this action; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment as to Dft Robert Bentley only pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/27/2018. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES EDWARD WHITE, #209 419, ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-842-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAPT. BRENDA KING, et al., Defendants. ORDER This case is before the court on a Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on March 6, 2018. Doc. 13. There being no objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint and amendment thereto against Defendant Bentley is DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 2. Defendant Bentley is DISMISSED as a party to this action. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment as to Defendant Robert Bentley only pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed and is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Done, this 27th day of March 2018. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?