Davis v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
Filing
11
ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1. The Magistrate Judge's 10 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and 2. The 28 USC 2254 petition is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/4/2021. (bes, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTONIO D. DAVIS, # 212703,
Petitioner,
v.
JOHN CROW, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
2:18cv16-WHA-SMD
[WO]
ORDER
On December 3, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which
no timely objections have been filed. Doc. # 10. Upon an independent review of
the record and consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 10) is ADOPTED; and
2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED
with prejudice.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 4h day of January, 2021.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?