Thompson v. Target Corporation (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)

Filing 14

OPINION AND ORDER: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: 1) The magistrate judge's 12 recommendation is adopted; 2) Plf's 6 & 13 motions to remand are granted; 3) Pursuant to 28 USC 1447(c), this cause is remande d to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, AL; DIRECTING the clerk to take appropriate steps to effect the remand; This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/11/2018. (Copies of certified Opinion and Order & Docket Sheet mailed to Montgomery County Circuit Court)(alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION KAREN THOMPSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION d/b/a Target Stores, Inc., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv97-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff state filed court. this After personal-injury defendant removed lawsuit the case in to federal court, claiming that the court has diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff moved to remand. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States remanded to state jurisdiction. recommendation. review of Magistrate the court There for are After record, Judge an the that lack no of case be subject-matter objections independent court the and concludes to the de novo that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. *** Accordingly, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 12) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motions to remand (doc. nos. 6 & 13) are granted. (3) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery is DIRECTED County, Alabama. The clerk of the court to take appropriate steps to effect the remand. This case is closed in this court. DONE, this the 11th day of April, 2018. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?