Wells v. Gourmet Services Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Filing
36
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plf's 34 objections are overruled; (2) the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPT ED; (3) granting defs' 17 Motion to Dismiss; (4) plf's denying 23 and 27 Motions for judgment on the pleadings and for default and default judgment are denied; (5) this lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice; further ORDERING that co sts are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter the document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/10/18. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
LAWRENCE WELLS,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOURMET SERVICES INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:18cv135-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's
objections
(doc.
no.
34)
are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 33) is adopted.
(3) Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 17) is
granted.
(4)
Plaintiff’s
motions
for
judgment
on
the
pleadings and for default and default judgment (doc.
nos. 23 & 27) are denied.
(5) This lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 10th day of October, 2018.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?