Crenshaw v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 20

ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: 1. Crenshaw's Objections (Doc. 19 ) are OVERRULED; 2. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17 ) is ADOPTED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Crenshaw's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 19 ) is DENIED. Final Judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/28/2021. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
STEPHEN SHAWN CRENSHAW,
# 238636,
Petitioner,
v.
WALTER MYERS, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.
2:18cv169-WHA-CSC
[WO]

ORDER
On December 22, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation that
Petitioner Stephen Shawn Crenshaw’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and this case be dismissed with prejudice, because the petition is
time-barred under the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). (Doc. # 17.)
Crenshaw has filed Objections and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. # 19.)
Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate
Judge’s Recommendation and Crenshaw’s Objections, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Crenshaw’s Objections (Doc. # 19) are OVERRULED;
2. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 17) is ADOPTED; and
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that Crenshaw’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc.
# 19) is DENIED.
Final judgment will be entered separately.

DONE this 28th day of January, 2021.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2