Williams v. Ellis et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 34

ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The 32 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Dfts' 14 and 23 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. Costs are taxed against Plf; Final Judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/10/2021. (bes, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SHEDRICK WILLIAMS, #186 278, ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:18-CV-376-WHA-SMD ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DR. ELLIS (THE PRACTITIONER), et al., Defendants. ORDER On February 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objection has been filed. Doc. 32. There being no objection filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff. Final Judgment will be entered separately. Done, this 10th day of March 2021. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?