Robinson Miller v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al

Filing 141

FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court as follows: 1. Plaintiff's 123 motion for summary judgment is DENIED; 2. Defendants 125 motion for su mmary judgment is GRANTED as to all claims in the Complaint; 3. All claims against Defendant Montgomery County Board of Education are DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, and Seven are DISMISSED without prejudice as t o Defendants Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities. 5. Counts Eight, Nine, and Ten are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities; 6. The costs of this action should be taxed as paid; The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 10/21/2022. (es, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRIDGETT ROBINSON-MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD
OF EDUCATION, ANN ROY
MOORE, ROBERT PORTERFIELD,
LISA KEITH, W. DURDEN DEAN,
ELEANOR DAWKINS, MARY
BRIERS, MELISSA SNOWDEN,
ARICA WATKINS-SMITH, PATRICK
NELSON, and JOHN JOHNSTON,
Defendants.

)
)
)
) CASE NO. 2:18-cv-512-JTA
)
) (WO)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 123) is DENIED.
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 125) is GRANTED as to all
claims in the Complaint.
3. All claims against Defendant Montgomery County Board of Education are
DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, and Seven are DISMISSED without
prejudice as to Defendants Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W.

Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica WatkinsSmith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities.
5. Counts Eight, Nine, and Ten are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Ann
Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins,
Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John
Johnston, in their official and individual capacities.
6. The costs of this action should be taxed as paid.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as
a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
DONE this 21st day of October, 2022.

JERUSHA T. ADAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2