Binion et al v. The United States Department of Agriculture et al (MAG+)

Filing 68

OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 58 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted; 2) The 50 motion for preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice; 3) The 51 motion to set a hearing for prelimin ary injunction argument and limited discovery regarding the same matter is denied as moot; It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/21/2020. (am, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT BINION and COREY LEA, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and SONNY PERDUE, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv544-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiffs’ motion for prejudice preliminary and that injunction plaintiffs’ preliminary-injunction hearing be denied motion and for discovery on the matter be denied as moot. no objections to the recommendation. to without set a limited There are Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 58) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 50) is denied without prejudice. (3) The motion to set a hearing for preliminary injunction argument and limited discovery regarding the same matter (doc. no. 51) is denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 21st day of August, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?