Joyner v. Sanders et al (MAG+)
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 44 Recommendation is ADOPTED and that: 1) Defs' motion to dismiss (Doc. # 35 ) is GRANTED; 2) Plf's 42 U.S.C. 1985(3) claim is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 3) Plf's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/11/2020. (cwl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
LEROY T. JOYNER, JR.,
SHELLY SANDERS, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:18-CV-1035-WKW
On August 24, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 44.) Upon an independent review of
the record, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED and that:
1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. # 35) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) claim is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
3. Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 11th day of September, 2020.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?