Martin v. Cook et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 8

ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The plf's claims against Bullock C.F. and the AL DOC are summarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) Bullock C.F. and the AL DOC are dismissed as dfts in this cause of action; 4) This case, with respect to the plf's claims against Mary Cook and Captain King, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/9/2019. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JONATHAN HUNTER MARTIN, AIS #276233, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MARY COOK, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-1042-WHA ORDER On December 14, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #4) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff’s claims against Bullock Correctional Facility and the Alabama Department of Corrections are summarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. Bullock Correctional Facility and the Alabama Department of Corrections are dismissed as defendants in this cause of action. 4. This case, with respect to the plaintiff’s claims against Mary Cook and Captain King, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. DONE this 9th day of January, 2019. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?