Ratcliffe v. Headly et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 27

ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 26 Recommendation is ADOPTED and that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/9/2022. (am, )

Case 2:21-cv-00115-WKW-CSC Document 32 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR., )
#200291,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
LEIGH GWATHNEY,
)
)
Defendant.
)

CASE NO. 2:21-CV-115-WKW
[WO]

MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR., )
#200291,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DWAYNE SPURLOCK,
)
)
Defendant.
)

CASE NO. 2:21-CV-116-WKW
[WO]

MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR., )
#200291,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CLIFF WALKER,
)
)
Defendant.
)

CASE NO. 2:21-CV-117-WKW
[WO]

Case 2:21-cv-00115-WKW-CSC Document 32 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2

MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR., )
#200291,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CHARLES GRADDICK,
)
)
Defendant.
)

CASE NO. 2:21-CV-118-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiff’s filing (Doc. # 31), which is construed as a
motion to compel the production of an affidavit. In a prior order, the court has
explained why it is impossible to grant this relief. (Doc. # 30.)
It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. # 31) is DENIED for the reasons
stated in the prior order (Doc. # 30); the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide
a copy of the prior order (Doc. # 30) to Plaintiff.
Plaintiff is cautioned that if he continues make filings in these cases requesting
information from his warden, his actions will be subject to sanctions. These
sanctions may include a monetary fine taken from his inmate account and/or
direction to the Clerk of the Court to reject filings under these case numbers.
DONE this 9th day of May, 2022.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2