Parks Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. OptumRx, Inc.
Filing
39
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 38 motion to withdraw is GRANTED to the extent that the 9 motion to compel arbitration is deemed unopposed; it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Dft's 9 unopposed motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED; (2) Pursu ant to 9 USC 4, Plfs are ORDERED to submit this dispute to arbitration in the manner provided in the arbitration agreements (see Doc. # 10 ); (3) This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, as further set out in order; (4) Dft's 9 motion for dismissal with prejudice is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/8/2021. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
PARKS PHARMACY, INC., and
DEMETRIUS YVONNE PARKS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
OPTUMRX, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:19-CV-611-WKW
[WO]
ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion to withdraw their opposition to
Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. # 38.) As grounds, Plaintiffs assert
that they “desire to pursue settling” their claims in binding arbitration. (Doc. # 38.)
Based upon careful consideration, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. # 38) is
GRANTED to the extent that the motion to compel arbitration (Doc. # 9) is deemed
unopposed.
Furthermore, based upon a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1)
GRANTED.
Defendant’s unopposed motion to compel arbitration (Doc. # 9) is
(2)
Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to submit this
dispute to arbitration in the manner provided in the arbitration agreements (see Doc.
# 10).
(3)
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Either party may move
to reopen this action in order to enforce, vacate, or modify an award resulting from
the arbitral proceedings, if necessary and appropriate. See 9 U.S.C. § 9 (providing
the procedures for confirmation of an arbitration award in a United States district
court); id. § 10(a) (delineating four, narrow grounds for seeking vacatur of an
arbitration award); id. § 11 (setting forth the permissible bases for seeking
modification of an arbitration award).
(4)
Defendant’s motion for dismissal with prejudice (Doc. # 9) is DENIED.
DONE this 8th day of September, 2021.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?