Black v. Marshall (INMATE 2)

Filing 4

OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the Plf's 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plf's failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/10/2019. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BLACK, AIS # 279868, Plaintiff, v. STEVE MARSHALL, ALABAMA A.G., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:19-cv-616-ECM (WO) OPINION and ORDER On August 30, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 3) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, the Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon the initiation of this case. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 10th day of October, 2019. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?