Webster v. Henline (INMATE 1)
Filing
12
ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to provide the a correct as ordered by this court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 9/24/2020. (kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CORNELIUS WEBSTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT HENLINE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-361-RAH
ORDER
On July 24, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 11) to
which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and
upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to provide the
a correct as ordered by this court.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE, this 24th day of September, 2020.
/s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr.
R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?