Banks v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 3

ORDER: This lawsuit is before the court on the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. 1404. (Doc. 2 .) There bein g no timely objections filed to the Recommendation, and upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 2 ) is ADOPTED. (2) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. 1404. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the transfer of this action. This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 11/16/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION LEROY K. BANKS, #236 615, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN KENNETH PETERS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-577-RAH ) ) ) ) ORDER This lawsuit is before the court on the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. § 1404. (Doc. 2.) There being no timely objections filed to the Recommendation, and upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED. (2) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. § 1404. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the transfer of this action. This case is closed in this court. DONE, this 16th day of November, 2020. /s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?