Cooley v. Woodget (INMATE 1)

Filing 58

ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 57 ) is ADOPTED; 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23 ) is GRANTED; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. The Motion for Status (Doc. 56 ) is DENIED as moot; and 5. No costs are taxed. A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. on 03/29/2024. (GGN)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CHARLES EDWARD COOLEY, JR.,
# 230863,
Plaintiff,
v.
SEDRICK S. WOODGET,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:21-cv-0074-RAH-CSC

ORDER
Before the court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation entered March 6,
2024, dismissing this action with prejudice. (Doc. 57.). The Plaintiff has filed no objections to
this Recommendation. After an independent review of the Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. §
636(b), it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 57) is ADOPTED;
2. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED;
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice;
4. The Motion for Status (Doc. 56) is DENIED as moot; and
5. No costs are taxed.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
DONE, on this the 28th day of March 2024.

R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE