Wells v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
Filing
5
ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) the Magistrate Judge's #4 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and (2) this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction under 28 USC 2244(b)(3)(A) because Petitioner has not obtained permission from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to authorizing this court to consider his successive habeas petition. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/14/2021. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
NICHOLAS WELLS, # 207770,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, et al.,
Respondents.
Civil Action No.
2:21cv411-WHA-SRW
[WO]
ORDER
On June 21, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation to which no
timely objections have been filed. Doc. 4. Upon an independent review of the record and
consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
(1) the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED; and
(2) this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A)
because Petitioner has not obtained permission from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
to authorizing this court to consider his successive habeas petition.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 14th day of July, 2021.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?