Jones v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
22
ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1. The 19 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's claims against Covington County Commissioner Greg White are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915A; 3. Defendant White is TERMI NATED as a party to this action; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP as to Defendant White; This case is not closed and is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings regarding Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/11/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(am, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOSEPH C. JONES, II,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
BLAKE TURMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:21-CV-457-WHA-SMD
ORDER
On December 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely
objection has been filed. Doc. 19. There being no objection filed to the Recommendation, and after
an independent review of the file, the Court concludes the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff’s claims against Covington County Commissioner Greg White are
DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
3. Defendant White is TERMINATED as a party to this action.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final
judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to Defendant White.
This case is not closed and is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings regarding Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants.
Done, this 11th day of January 2022.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?