Sharp v. Inspections Department, City of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+)

Filing 17

ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The 16 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. The 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 3. The Plf is afforded an opportunity to comply with the federal pleading standards and the directives set forth in the 16 Recommendation; The Plf shall file an Amended Complaint on or before 2/8/2023. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 1/17/2023. (bes, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KEITH L. SHARP,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:22-CV-127-RAH

ORDER
On November 14, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 16.) Upon an independent review of the file and
upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED;

2.

The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED;

3.

The Plaintiff is afforded an opportunity to comply with the federal pleading
standards and the directives set forth in the Recommendation (Doc. 16). The
Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint on or before February 8, 2023.

The Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that the failure to comply with the directives of this Order
may result in dismissal of this case.
DONE, on this the 17th day of January, 2023.
/s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr.
R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE