Howard v. Chilton County Judicial System et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER: there being no timely objections filed to the 4 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, the 4 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/29/2022. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANDRA HOWARD, SR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CHILTON CTY. JUD. SYS., et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:22-CV-291-WHA-SMD ORDER This case is before the Court on a Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on July 7, 2022. Doc. 4. The Magistrate Judge recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. Plaintiff’s objections were due by July 21, 2022. Id. at 2. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Recommendation. Accordingly, there being no timely objections filed to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Final Judgment will be entered separately. Done, this 29th day of July, 2022. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?