Cable v. Madison County Probation & Parole Department et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
5
OPINION & ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's 4 recommendation is adopted; (2) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; (3) All pending motions are left for resolution by the transferee court; DIRECTING the clerk to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer; This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/23/2023. (am, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTHONY J. CABLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MADISON COUNTY PROBATION
AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, et
al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:23cv199-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state
prisoner, filed this lawsuit asserting that his rights
to
due
process
and
equal
protection
were
violated
during parole-revocation proceedings that took place in
Madison County, Alabama.
court
on
the
This lawsuit is before the
recommendation
of
the
United
States
Magistrate Judge that the case be transferred to the
United States District Court for the Northern District
of
Alabama
1404(a).
pursuant
to
There
are
recommendation.
After
28
U.S.C.
no
an
§§
1391(b)
objections
independent
and
and
to
the
de
novo
review
of
the
record,
the
court
concludes
that
the
magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted.
***
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The magistrate judge's recommendation (Doc. 4)
is adopted.
(2) This case is transferred to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
(3) All pending motions are left for resolution by
the transferee court.
The
clerk
of
the
court
is
DIRECTED
to
take
appropriate steps to effect the transfer.
This case is closed in this court.
DONE, this the 23rd day of May, 2023.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?