Cable v. Madison County Probation & Parole Department et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 5

OPINION & ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's #4 recommendation is adopted; (2) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; (3) All pending motions are left for resolution by the transferee court; DIRECTING the clerk to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer; This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/23/2023. (am, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ANTHONY J. CABLE, Plaintiff, v. MADISON COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23cv199-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit asserting that his rights to due process and equal protection were violated during parole-revocation proceedings that took place in Madison County, Alabama. court on the This lawsuit is before the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1404(a). pursuant to There are recommendation. After 28 U.S.C. no an §§ 1391(b) objections independent and and to the de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. *** Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's recommendation (Doc. 4) is adopted. (2) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. (3) All pending motions are left for resolution by the transferee court. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer. This case is closed in this court. DONE, this the 23rd day of May, 2023. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?