McIntosh v. Ragland et al (MAG+)

Filing 26

ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The 24 Recommendation is ADOPTED. 2. The 10 & 13 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED as moot without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 7/9/2024. (BES)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION REBECCA Y. MCINTOSH, Plaintiff, v. CAMRON RAGLAND, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:23-CV-470-RAH-JTA ORDER On June 11, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 24.) Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED. 2. The Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 10, 13) are DENIED as moot without prejudice. DONE, on this the 9th day of July 2024. R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?