Daniel v. Veteran Affairs et al (MAG+)

Filing 16

ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1.) The 15 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2.) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. on 3/11/2025. (BES)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTUANE D. DANIEL, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
VETERAN AFFAIRS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:24-cv-351-RAH

ORDER
On February 11, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 15.) The Complaint lacks
allegations from which the Court can determine whether it has jurisdiction or to
determine whether the Plaintiff has stated a claim. (See doc. 1.) The Magistrate
Judge provided the Plaintiff multiple opportunities to amend the Complaint, but the
Plaintiff failed to do so. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge
recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice “for failure to comply with
court orders and failure to prosecute.” (Doc. 15 at 2.) Upon an independent review
of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 15) is ADOPTED;
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
DONE, on this the 11th day of March 2025.

R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2