Latham v. Booth et al (MAG+)

Filing 9

ORDERED as follows: 1. The 8 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and 2. The Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. on 1/28/2025. (AM)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DENNIS C. LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. JOY BOOTH and MILLBROOK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:24-cv-00707-RAH ORDER On December 27, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (doc. 8) to which no timely objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 1) be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 8 at 2.) Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation (doc. 8) is ADOPTED; and 2. The Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE, on this the 28th day of January 2025. R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?