Briskey v. Fuller et al (INMATE 2)(JC)

Filing 3

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Durward O'Neal Briskey, it is the Recommendation of the Mag. Judge that: 1) Plaintiff's claims against Commissioner Wright be dismissed with prejudice prior to service of proc ess pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 2) Commissioner Wright be dismissed as a party to this complaint; and 3) This case with respect to the remaining defendants be referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 8/24/2005. Signed by Judge Vanzetta P. McPherson on 8/10/05. (vmc, )

Download PDF
Briskey v. Fuller et al (INMATE 2)(JC) Doc. 3 Case 3:05-cv-00725-MHT-VPM Document 3 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T ER N DIVISION _______________________________ D U R W A R D O'NEAL BRISKEY Plaintiff, v. CO M M ISS IO NE R W RIG HT , et al., Defendants. _______________________________ * * * CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05-CV-725-T (WO) * * R E C O M M E N D A TI O N OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE P l a i n ti f f is currently incarcerated in the Randolph County Jail located in Wedowee, A l a b a m a . He filed this 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint on August 3, 2005 alleging that the c o n d i t io n s of confinement in the jail are unconstitutional. Plaintiff names as defendants Co unty Commissioner Wright, Sheriff Jeff Fuller, Chief Shirley Johnson, and Captain Craig D a v i d s o n . Upon review of the complaint, the court concludes that dismissal of Plaintiff's c la im s against Commissioner Wright prior to service of process is appropriate under 28 U.S.C . 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). D I SC U S S I O N Plaintiff's complaint regarding the conditions under which he is housed in the R a n d o l p h County Jail may not proceed against County Commissioner Wright. A county Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:05-cv-00725-MHT-VPM Document 3 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 2 of 3 c o m m i s s i o n e r cannot be held liable for actions undertaken during the daily operation of a coun ty jail. Turquitt v. Jefferson County, Alabama, 137 F.3d 1285, 1289 (11 th Cir. 1998). Mo reover, county commissioners are entitled to absolute immunity under 1983 for claims a r i si n g from the appropriation of funds for the maintenance of a county jail. Woods v. G a r n e r , 132 F.3d 1417, 1420 (11 th Cir. 1998). Consequently, Plaintiff's claims against C o m m i s s i o n e r Wright are due to be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii). C O N C L U S IO N Ac cord ingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Commissioner Wright be DISMISSED with prejudice p r i o r to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 2 . Commissioner Wright be DISMISSED as a party to this complaint; and 3 . This case with respect to the remaining defendants be referred back to the und ersig ned for additional proceedings. It is further O R D E R E D that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said R e c o m m e n d a t i o n on or before 24 August 2005. Any objections filed must specifically identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation objected to. Frivolous, c o n c l u s iv e or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The parties are a d v i s e d that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not 2 Case 3:05-cv-00725-MHT-VPM Document 3 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 3 of 3 a p p e a l a b le . Failu re to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the M a g i s trate Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District Cou rt of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual f i n d in g s in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain e r r o r or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 th Cir. 1982). See Stein v . Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of P r i c h a r d , 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981, en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the d e c i s io n s of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on S e p t e m b e r 30, 1981. D o n e this 10th day of August, 2005. /s/ Vanzetta Penn McPherson V A N Z E T TA PENN MCPHERSON U N I TE D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?