Huguley v. Folks et al (INMATE1)
ORDER ADOPTING 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DENIED as Petitioner failed to file his petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 2/11/2009. (cc, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION R O D R IG U E S HUGULEY, #184418, P e titio n e r, v. S Y L V E S T E R FOLKS, et al., R e s p o n d e n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 3:06-CV-333-WKW [WO]
ORDER T h e re being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 46), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the R e c o m m e n d a tio n is adopted, that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DENIED as Petitioner f a ile d to file his petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. D O N E this 11th day of February, 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?