Walker v. Culliver et al (INMATE2)
ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This 1 28 U.S.C. petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Joseph E. Walker on 1/17/2007 be DENIED, as Walker failed to file the petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1). This case be DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/21/2008. (dmn)
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION J O S E P H E. WALKER, #189482, Petitioner, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
3:07-CV-62-WHA [W O ]
G R A N T CULLIVER, WARDEN, et al., Respondents.
O n November 3, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (D o c . 17) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent r e v ie w of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the M a g istra te Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 17) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h is 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Joseph E. W a lk e r on January 17, 2007 be DENIED, as Walker failed to file the petition w ith in the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). 3. T h is case be DISMISSED with prejudice. A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 21st day of November, 2008. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?