Mahone v. Thomas et al (INMATE2)
ORDER and RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE as follows: It is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the instant complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Ordered that (1) the clerk file a copy of Document #1 from the present action in Civil Action Number 3:07cv500-MEF and docket said pleading as a supplement to the petition in that case; (2) the clerk file a copy of this order in Civil Action No. 3:07cv500-MEF; (3) petitioner's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. Objections to R&R due by 7/17/2007. Signed by Judge Wallace Capel Jr. on 7/5/07. (sl, )
Mahone v. Thomas et al (INMATE2)
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION _____________________________ DEAN ERIC MAHONE, #214 209 P e t i t io n e r , v. W IL L IE THOMAS, WARDEN, et al., R e s p o n d e n ts . _____________________________ * * * * * 3:07-CV-600-WKW (WO)
O R D E R AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE T h e above-captioned action was filed in this court on June 28, 2007. Upon review of th e petition, the undersigned is persuaded that Petitioner's June 28 pleading is actually his c o m p lia n c e with an order entered on June 8, 2007 in Mahone v. Thomas, Civil Action No. 3 :0 7 -C V -5 0 0 -M E F . In that order, the court directed Petitioner to supplement his petition by c o m p le tin g a form used in filing petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The order further d ire c te d Petitioner to return the completed form to the court for filing on or before June 22, 2 0 0 7 . A review of the Petitioner's June 28 pleading also reflects that he referenced the case n u m b e r for his pending habeas corpus case on the first page of the form petition . (See Doc. N o . 1 at 1.) In light of the foregoing, the court finds it appropriate to recommend that the instant p e titio n be dismissed. The court further deems it appropriate to direct the Clerk to file a c o p y of Petitioner's June 28, 2007 pleading in Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-500-MEF and
Page 2 of 3
docket said pleading as a supplement in that action in accordance with the court's June 8, 2 0 0 7 order entered in that case. Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that the instant c o m p la in t be DISMISSED without prejudice. It is ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk file a copy of Document Number 1 from the present action in Civil
A c tio n Number 3:07-CV-500-MEF and docket said pleading as a supplement to the petition in that case; 2. 3. The Clerk FILE a copy of this order in Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-500-MEF; Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2), filed
o n June 28, 2007, be DENIED as moot. It is further O R D E R E D that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the R e c o m m e n d a tio n on or before July 17, 2007. Any objections filed must specifically
id e n tif y the findings in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation to which a party objects. F r iv o lo u s , conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District Court. The p a rtie s are advised that this Recommendation is not a final order of the court and, therefore, it is not appealable. F a ilu re to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations in the M a g is tra te Judge's report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the District C o u rt of issues covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual
Page 3 of 3
findings in the report accepted or adopted by the District Court except upon grounds of plain e rr o r or manifest injustice. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5 th Cir. 1982). See Stein v . Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d 33 (11 th Cir. 1982). See also Bonner v. City of P r ic h a r d , 661 F.2d 1206 (11 th Cir. 1981, en banc), adopting as binding precedent all of the d e c i s io n s of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on S e p te m b e r 30, 1981. D o n e , this 5 th day of July 2007. /s / Wallace Capel, Jr. W A L L A C E CAPEL, JR. U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?