Coggins v. Martin
JUDGMENT it is the Order, Judgment, and Decree of the court: 1) granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gene Coggins to the extent that plaintiff Gene Coggins's complaint shall be filed without the prepayment of fees; and 2)That plaintiff's Coggins's complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); denying as moot 3 MOTION to use the appendix system filed by Gene Coggins; It is further Ordered that costs are taxed ag ainst plaintiff Coggins, for which execution may issue; The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/8/08. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
Coggins v. Martin
Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION GENE COGGINS, Plaintiff, v. RAY MARTIN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) That the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is granted to the extent that plaintiff Gene Coggins's complaint shall be filed without the prepayment of fees; and (2) That plaintiff Coggins's complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08cv258-MHT (WO)
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). It is further ORDERED that the motion for an appendix (Doc. No. 3) is denied as moot.
Page 2 of 2
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Coggins, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 8th day of April, 2008. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?