Robert v. Abbett et al (MAG+)
ORDER ADOPTING 86 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; The motions to amend (docs. 76 , 85 ) are granted; 3) The motions to dismiss (docs. 40 , 41 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 51 , 52 . 54 , 60 , 63 , 67 , 74 are granted; 4) the claims for malicious pros ecution, the claims for Eighth Amendment violations, and the claims for declaratory and injunctive relief (see doc. 86 , at 47-48) are dismissed without prejudice, all other federal claims are dismissed with prejudice; 5) The remaining state-law cla ims are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c)(3); 6) The motions to strike (doc.s. 59 , 80 ) and motion on the pleadings (doc. 82 ) are denied; 7 ) The motion to quash service (doc. 49 ) is denied as moot; 8) The motions for sanc tions under Rule 11 of the FRCP (docs. 44 , 46 ) are denied; 9) All other outstanding motions are denied as moot. Signed by Honorable W. Keith Watkins on 3/31/09. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, ) Modified on 3/31/2009 - to correct Judge's signature to show Judge W. Keith Watkins (vma, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION H E W IT T P. ROBERT, JR., P l a i n t i ff , v. VA N C E N. ABBETT, in his o ffic ia l and individual capacity, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E N O . 3:08-C V- 3 2 9 - W K W (W O )
ORDER T h e re being no objections filed to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e (Doc. # 86), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED th a t: (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) T h e recommendation (Doc. # 86) is ADOPTED; T h e motions to amend (Docs. # 76, 85) are GRANTED; T h e motions to dismiss (Docs. # 40, 41, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 54, 60, 63, 67, 74)
a re GRANTED; (4 ) T h e claims for malicious prosecution, the claims for Eighth Amendment
v io la tio n s , and the claims for declaratory and injunctive relief (see Doc. # 86, at 47-48) are D IS M IS S E D without prejudice; all other federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; (5 ) T h e remaining state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3); (6 ) a re DENIED; T h e motions to strike (Docs. # 59, 80) and motion on the pleadings (Doc. # 82)
(7) (8 )
T h e motion to quash service (Doc. # 49) is DENIED as moot; T h e motions for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil
P ro c e d u re (Docs. # 44, 46) are DENIED; (9 ) A ll other outstanding motions are DENIED as moot.
A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D O N E this 31st day of March 2009. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?