Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Petry Construction, Inc. et al
ORDER denying as moot 66 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, 75 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 85 Objection and Motion to Strike Defendants' Evidentiary Submission of Defendants and 88 Motion for Leave to Respond to Defendants' Reply Brief. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/16/2010. (cc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION A U T O -O W N E R S INSURANCE C OM PA N Y , P l a in tif f , v. P E T R Y CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 3:08-cv-572-MEF-TFM (W O - DO NOT PUBLISH)
ORDER T h e parties having informed the Court that they have reached a settlement in this m a tte r, it is hereby ORDERED that 1 ) The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Motion for S u m m a ry Judgment (Doc. #66) is DENIED as moot; 2 ) The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #75) is DENIED as moot; 3 ) The Objection and Motion to Strike Defendants' Evidentiary Submission of D e f en d a n ts (Doc. #85) is DENIED as moot; and 4 ) The Motion for Leave to Respond to Defendants' Reply Brief (Doc. #88) is D E N IE D as moot. DONE this 16th day of March, 2010.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?