Sigler v. RBC Bank (USA) et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that RBC Bank and Robert Davis's 77 MOTION for Partial Summary is GRANTED; that the claims set forth in Count Eight of the Third Amended Complaint against Defendants RBC Bank and Robert L. Davis are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and RBC Bank and Robert L. Davis are entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to those claims; that on or before February 15, 2011, Sigler shall show cause why the Court should not enter judgment as a matter of law on the TILA claim brought against Brown for the very same reasons that it granted the motion brought by RBC Bank and Davis. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/1/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?