Brooks v. Astrue
OPINION AND ORDER that the defendant's 15 Motion to Remand be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is hereby REVERSED and this case be and is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 6/25/2010. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION R H O D A L. BROOKS, P l a in tif f , v. M IC H A E L J. ASTRUE, C o m m is s io n e r of Social Security, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C I V IL ACTION NO. 3:09cv1122-CSC
O P I N I O N and ORDER O n June 24, 2010, the defendant filed a motion to reverse and remand for further p ro c e e d in g s pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Doc. # 15. The plaintiff d o e s not object to a remand. In addition, the parties have consented to entry of final judgment b y the United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that the defendant's motion to remand (doc. # 15) be and is hereby G R A N T E D . It is further O R D E R E D AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is hereby R E V E R S E D and this case be and is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further p r o c e e d in g s . D o n e this day of 25 th day of June 2010.
/s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?