Springer v. Perryman et al (MAG+)
ORDER directing as follows: (1) Mr. Springer's 25 objection is OVERRULED; (2) the 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (3) this action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 4/6/10. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T H E MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION J A C O B C. SPRINGER, P la in tif f , v. S T E V E PERRYMAN, Circuit Court J u d g e , et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER O n March 23, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case. (Doc. # 24.) Plaintiff Jacob C. Springer filed an Objection on April 1, 2010. (Doc. # 25.) Upon a n independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which o b je c tio n is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. 3. M r. Springer's Objection (Doc. # 25) is OVERRULED. T h e Recommendation (Doc. # 24) is ADOPTED. T h is action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
C A S E NO. 3:10-CV-14-WKW [W O ]
A n appropriate judgment will be entered. D O N E this 6th day of April, 2010.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?