Newsome v. Kwangsung America, Corp.
Filing
62
ORDER granting 42 Motion in Limine to Exclude Any Witnesses, Argument, or Line of Questioning by Defendant that Other Employees Were Terminated for Similar Reasons. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/7/2011. (br, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARLES NEWSOME,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
KWANGSUNG AMERICA, CORP.,
Defendant.
Civil Action No. 3:10CV548-WHA
(wo)
ORDER
This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Any
Witnesses, Argument, or Line of Questioning by Defendant that Other Employees Were
Terminated for Similar Reasons (Doc. #42).
The Order on Pre-Trial Hearing entered in this case gave September 6, 2011 as the
deadline for nonmovants to reply to motions in limine. See Doc. #36 at ¶ 5. The Uniform
Scheduling Order entered in this case provides that the “failure to file a response to any
motion–either dispositive or non-dispositive–within the time allowed by the Court shall indicate
that there is no opposition to the motion.” See Doc. #15 at § 6.
The case docket reflects that no response has been filed by the Defendant to the Plaintiff’s
Motion in Limine (Doc. #42). Therefore, there being no opposition to the Motion in Limine, it is
hereby
ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Any Witnesses, Argument,
or Line of Questioning by Defendant that Other Employees Were Terminated for Similar
Reasons (Doc. #42) is GRANTED.
Done this 7th day of September, 2011.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?