Lee v. Amrest, LLC

Filing 17

ORDER referring discovery issues re 16 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting to Magistrate Judge Coody for assistance in the resolution of these issues, and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/9/2010. (br, )

Download PDF
-CSC Lee v. Amrest, LLC Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION M A R IC U S LEE P la in tif f , v. A M R E S T , LLC, d/b/a APPLEBEE'S, D e f e n d a n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 3:10-CV-770-MEF-CSC (W O D o Not Publish) ORDER T h is Court has reviewed the parties' Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting filed o n November 8, 2010. The parties have reported two areas of dispute as to discoveryre la te d issues, which have yet to be resolved. Specifically, the parties have not reached a n agreement on the following: (1) the maximum number of requests for production of d o c u m e n ts ; and (2) the deadline for supplementation of disclosures and responses under F e d e ra l Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e). It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the matter is h e re b y referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody to assist in the re s o lu tio n of these issues of discovery, and entry of any orders or recommendations as m a y be appropriate. D O N E this the 9 day of November, 2010. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE th Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?