Huguley v. Lockhart et al (INMATE2)

Filing 27

ORDER AND OPINION; that the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Burdette and Jackson are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I); 2. Defendants Burdette and Jackson are DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and 3. This case with respect to the remaining defendants is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 12/15/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
-SRW Huguley v. Lockhart et al (INMATE2) Doc. 27 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION C O R E Y JERMAINE HUGULEY, #262429, P l a in tif f , v. S ID LOCKHART, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C IV IL ACTION NO. 3:10cv803-TMH O R D E R AND OPINION O n November 3, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to w h ic h no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 9). Upon an independent review of the f ile in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. P la in tif f 's claims against Defendant Burdette and Jackson are DISMISSED w ith prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1 9 1 5 (e )(2 )(B )(I); 2. D e f e n d a n ts Burdette and Jackson are DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and 3. T h is case with respect to the remaining defendants is REFERRED back to the m a g is tra te judge for further proceedings. Dockets.Justia.com D o n e this the 15 th day of December, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________________ _ _ _ _ S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?