Sistrunk v. Veasey et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations; that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 12/6/2010. (cc, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK, Plaintiff, v. DAVID M. VEASEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:10-CV-816-WKW ORDER On November 16, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 4) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 4) is ADOPTED; Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). DONE this 6th day of December, 2010. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?