Thompson v. The Sheriff of Russell County (INMATE 1)

Filing 52

ORDER overruling the 40 and 51 Objections; adopting 37 Recommendation; denying the the motion for leave to proceed in form pauperis; dismissing the case without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/29/2011. (br, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION JOSEPH THOMPSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. SHERIFF HEATH TAYLOR, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv028-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #37), entered on August 29, 2011. The Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Recommendation (Doc. #40) on September 7, 2011, and, after being granted extensions to do so, filed a Supplement to the Objection (Doc. #51) on November 3, 2011. After an independent review of the file, and a de novo evaluation of this case, the court finds the objection and supplemental objection to be without merit, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 29th day of November, 2011. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?