Hatfield v. Fresenius Medical Care Dialysis Services (MAG+)

Filing 10

ORDER that (1) The magistrate judge's recommendation 8 is adopted. (2) Defendant's motion to dismiss 7 is denied. (3) This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/20/2011. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

AKILAH E. HATFIELD,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE
DIALYSIS SERVICES,
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:11cv53-MHT

ORDER
After

an

independent

and

de

novo

review

of

the

record, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
8) is adopted.
(2) Defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. no.7) is
denied.
(3) This matter is referred back to the magistrate
judge for further appropriate proceedings.
DONE, this the 20th day of June, 2011.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE