Dardy v. Converse, et al (MAG+)
Filing
10
ORDER directing that, upon review of the 9 Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's claims related to the pending criminal charges against him in the Circuit Court of Lee County are DISMISSED without prejudice under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (2) and Plaintiff's defamation and slander claims are DISMISSED without prejudice under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 5/4/11. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
CHARLIE FRANK DARDY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD CONVERSE,
et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-131-WKW
ORDER
On April 19, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 9.) Upon an independent review of the file in
this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the
Recommendation is ADOPTED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s claims related to the pending criminal charges against him in the Circuit
Court of Lee County are DISMISSED without prejudice under the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
(2) and Plaintiff’s defamation and slander claims are DISMISSED without prejudice
under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).
DONE this 4th day of May, 2011.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?